Teaming with sarod maestro Amjad Ali Khan, Amaan and Ayaan Ali Bangash, and Kabir Sehgal, His Holiness delivers a 21st-century manifesto on ‘oneness, climate action, and the need for a ‘warm-hearted’ global education
At 90, His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama has bagged his first Grammy Award for his spoken-word audio book Meditations: The Reflections of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, which won in the category of Best Audio Book, Narration, and Storytelling Recording. The album, a collaborative work that combines his reflections with musical accompaniment by sarod maestro Ustad Amjad Ali Khan and his sons, Amaan Ali Bangash and Ayaan Ali Bangash, and Grammy-winning producer, author and composer Kabir Sehgal, transposes his spiritual teachings into the format of a studio-produced spoken-word album intended for the 21st-century listener, who engage with podcasts, audiobooks, and music streaming platforms. You can listen to the entire album on Spotify.
Meditations consists of the Dalai Lama’s spoken reflections on peace, compassion, kindness, mindful awareness, human interconnectedness, and collective well-being. Across roughly 10 tracks — with titles such as Oneness, Kindness, and Harmony — the album articulates Buddhist precepts in accessible language while also addressing universal human concerns. It argues for the interdependence of all human beings, a fundamental tenet of Buddhist metaphysics that emphasises the lack of an isolated self and the intrinsic connections between individuals and communities.
Oneness of humanity
The album opens with the five-minute-long Heart, which the Dalai Lama uses as a metaphor for compassion, empathy, love and kindness. “Since we are social animals, one individual’s survival or happy life entirely depend on rest of the community,” he states, adding that what our education lacks is teaching people how to have peace of mind, and that ‘entire humanity needs warm-heartedness’, which brings inner peace. In Buddhist thought, compassion (karuṇa) is an active engagement with suffering — both one’s own and that of others — and is inseparable from wisdom (prajñā).
A central thread is the idea of oneness of humanity. His Holiness repeatedly insists that there is “no use to fight each other” and that the time has come to think of the world rather than “my nation” or “my continent.” He pushes back against the mental habit of dividing humans into categories — nation, race, religion, rich and poor — and treating those distinctions as fundamental. For him, these are secondary labels laid on top of a deeper reality: that we are all human beings.
The Dalai Lama, in subsequent tracks, reflects on what it means to be human in a time of global crisis. He talks about generational responsibility, global unity beyond nations and religions, compassion as the core of human nature, the failures of modern education, the urgency of environmental stewardship — especially water — and the inner work of transforming the mind. If humanity is to survive and flourish, he underlines, we must recognise our shared identity, cultivate compassion, care for the planet, and train our minds.
His own generation, the Dalai Lama says, has faced many problems; his hope is that future generations will experience a world that is “more peaceful, more equal.” But this is not something that will happen on its own. He stresses that each person has a responsibility: young people cannot just inherit a better world; they must help create it. This responsibility is not abstract — he continually ties it to concrete issues like war, division, and environmental destruction.
Also read: Grammys 2026: The Dalai Lama wins first award, Kendrick Lamar makes history
This is not just an ethical claim; it’s also a response to the current state of the world. He points to global warming as a kind of teacher, forcing us to see that we live on one shared planet and face shared consequences. Climate change does not recognise borders, and so, he argues, we must begin to act “as one human being.” In this sense, the climate crisis becomes evidence that old ways of thinking — us vs. them, my country vs. your country — are “out of date.”
Education and future generations
He reflects personally on what shaped his own perspective: being a refugee. Having “lost my own country,” he says he is “quite open” and no longer strongly attached to “my nation” as an identity. He even says, half-playfully but also seriously, that others “also should be refugee”—not literally, but in the sense of letting go of possessive nationalism. In his view, the insistence on “my country, your country” creates mental distance and becomes a basis for conflict. Since all human beings are born the same way and die the same way, he argues there is no proper basis to separate into mental camps of “us” and “them.”
From this shared-humanity perspective, he arrives at compassion. He states that basic human nature is compassionate and contrasts this with the history of violence, which he attributes to hatred and narrow self-centeredness. When we truly understand that much of human suffering arises from such destructive emotions, he says, we can even feel compassion for those who continue to act out of hatred and selfishness. They too become objects of concern, not enemies.
Compassion, for him, is not sentimental. He calls it a “key factor” — especially for leaders. He suggests that leadership without compassion tends toward self-interest and harm, whereas compassionate motivation leads toward honesty and ethical action. He makes an important connection: compassion and honesty go together. A genuinely compassionate mind, he suggests, cannot coexist in a deep way with manipulative cleverness. One may use tactics temporarily, but the underlying motivation must remain compassionate for actions to be truly beneficial and trustworthy.
He then turns a critical eye on modern education. He notes that contemporary education systems, especially those shaped by Western models, are highly oriented toward intellectual and material success. Without religious belief or, more broadly, without an explicit cultivation of compassion, this education becomes “very much a materialistic sort of view.” Knowledge and technical skill are developed, but the heart is neglected. For him, this imbalance is dangerous in a world where we need “worldwide concern.”
His proposed remedy is simple but profound: education must include at least one lesson about warm-heartedness. This is not a marginal add-on; he sees it as central to meeting global challenges. Compassion should be taught not as dogma but grounded in “deeper experience and knowledge.” In other words, students should understand, through reflection and experience, that compassion improves life — individually and collectively. By reshaping education in this way, we prepare future generations not only to be competent, but also to be caring stewards of humanity and the Earth.
On water
From here, he grounds compassion in a very concrete responsibility: care for the environment, especially water. He points out that “water is a basis for our life” and describes his experience watching snow in the mountains decrease year by year. What used to feel like a guaranteed, endless supply of water is now visibly dwindling. This, again, leads him to the language of responsibility: humans must recognise that they share a duty to preserve “this big river,” these pure water sources, for future generations.
Also read: Alternative music, global healing: Indian-origin musicians strike a chord at the Grammys
He stresses that in the past, people lacked a sense of responsibility for water; they simply used it without thinking. Now, with clear signs of reduction, we must consciously preserve it. He imagines a possible future in which, if nothing changes, the world becomes more like a desert, the blue planet turning white and lifeless. Many animals and birds would reach their end; human survival itself would be threatened. However, he is not fatalistic. He believes that for at least the next few centuries, we can still keep the Earth a beautiful blue planet, if we act wisely.
Education again becomes central: younger generations must learn the limitations of water and their responsibility to protect it. This is not just technical environmentalism; he explicitly calls such efforts an expression of compassion — for future generations, for other living beings, and for the planet itself. Preserving water is not just about survival; it is a moral and compassionate act.
The quest for peace
He also turns inward, to the mind and emotions. He says that things do not exist as they appear, and that much of our experience depends on the mind. He speaks of discussions with scientists about mind and emotion and notes that his tradition — the Tibetan Nalanda tradition and Buddha Dharma — has “plenty of methods” to control destructive emotions and cultivate peace of mind. Peace and frustration, he says, are matters of emotion: anger disturbs the mind and destroys peace, whereas compassion and patience support inner stability.
He quotes an “ancient Tibetan master” who said that your enemy is your best teacher. It is through dealing with those who harm or oppose us that we can truly practice patience — an “important factor of peace of mind.” In this way, even conflict becomes an opportunity for inner growth. The same logic that leads him to see enemies as objects of compassion on the global scale also operates at the personal psychological level.
All humans, he argues, long for peace, and that genuine world peace must begin with peace of mind. He explains that when our inner mind is calm and peaceful, even the presence of weapons loses its power because we no longer wish to use them. The foundation of this inner peace, he says, is loving‑kindness and compassion, which he personally cultivates through daily meditation upon waking. This kind of peace is not just the absence of disturbance; it allows us to remain steady and compassionate even amid problems and difficulties. He stresses that these values are not limited to Buddhists but apply to all human beings, who are brothers and sisters sharing one planet and needing to live together in harmony.
Putting all of these threads together, his message is coherent and urgent. Humanity stands at a crossroads, facing problems like climate change, resource scarcity, and persistent conflict. The old patterns of strong national, religious, and group identities — without a balancing sense of global oneness — are no longer viable.
