Himmat Shah (1933-2025), who has passed away at 91, experimented across mediums; his sculptural heads are among the most distinctive works in modern Indian art
Himmat Shah (1933-2025), one of India’s most original and uncompromising modern artists, passed away on March 2 at the age of 91. A sculptor, draftsman, and experimenter across mediums, Shah’s body of work included terracotta and bronze heads, burnt paper collages, architectural murals and silver relief paintings. His practice was defined by an insatiable curiosity about material, form, and the passage of time. He was an artist whose work reflected both deep historical consciousness and a radical individualism.
Shah’s sculptural practice was rooted in an understanding of matter itself — how it could be shaped, how it bore traces of history, and how it carried its own voice. His signature terracotta heads (human form), for which he is most widely recognised, have an elemental quality, as though unearthed from some ancient site. And perhaps that was fitting, for Shah’s birthplace was Lothal, Gujarat — one of the major cities of the Indus Valley Civilisation, a site where art, craft, and urbanity was first found in the subcontinent thousands of years ago.
An instinctive affinity for clay’s tactility
Born in 1933, Shah’s early years were spent among the ruins of Lothal, where he absorbed the tactile and visual history of one of the world’s oldest civilizations. He trained as a drawing teacher before joining the Faculty of Fine Arts at M.S. University in Baroda from 1956 to 1960. This was a period of intellectual and artistic ferment in India, as a new generation of modernists sought to carve out a distinct visual language in the post-independence era. Shah was part of this vanguard, though he always stood apart.
Also read: How India failed MF Husain, a son of the soil, and one of its greatest artists
In 1967, he went to Paris where he studied etching at Atelier 17 under Krishna Reddy on a French government scholarship. But unlike many of his contemporaries who absorbed and adapted European influences into their work, Shah remained deeply invested in indigenous materials and the expressive potential of the handmade. His training in Paris refined his technical skills but never displaced his instinctive affinity for the raw tactility of clay, brick, and metal.
His signature terracotta, bronze heads
Shah was a founding member of Group 1890, an artists’ collective formed in 1963 under the leadership of J. Swaminathan. The group, though short-lived, was rejected the sentimentalism of the Bengal School and the derivative modernism of many academic painters of the time. Their manifesto called for a new approach to art that was neither beholden to Western influences nor constrained by nationalist nostalgia.
Jawaharlal Nehru inaugurated Group 1890’s first and only show in 1963. Soon after, the group disbanded, and each member followed their own trajectory. For Shah, this meant a turn toward sculpture and a deeper engagement with materials. By the late 1960s, he had begun to create monumental relief works in brick and cement, including the murals at St. Xavier’s School in Ahmedabad. But his true breakthrough came with his terracotta and bronze heads, which would become his most memorable works.
Shah’s sculptural heads are among the most distinctive works in modern Indian art. Far from being conventional portraits, they seem to exist outside of time — archaic and modern, abstract and intensely present. With their eroded surfaces, scored with cryptic markings, Shah’s heads suggest a history of damage and survival. Some appear fractured, as though broken and pieced together again. Others are marked with glyph-like inscriptions, hinting at an unreadable language. These sculptures carry the weight of antiquity, but they are also deeply personal — each one a meditation on what endures.
His approach to material was both rigorous and intuitive. He designed his own tools, developing unique methods of working with clay and metal. Unlike the sleek, polished surfaces of much modernist sculpture, Shah’s works bear the traces of their making —the rough textures, the fissures, the hand-carved indentations. His bronzes, too, resist the conventional finish of cast metal, often appearing weathered and worn, as if they had been pulled from the earth.
Drawing as a space of freedom
While Shah is best known as a sculptor, his drawings reveal another dimension of his artistic mind. He drew compulsively, filling notebooks with quick, gestural studies and elaborate compositions. His drawings often verge on the abstract, with swirling, chaotic lines that seem to throb with energy. Unlike his sculptures, which are marked by a deliberate stillness, his drawings have a restless, searching quality.
He worked in burnt paper collages as well, a medium that, like his terracotta heads, underlines his preoccupation with fragility and destruction. The act of burning — of subjecting paper to fire and then reassembling the remnants — echoed the themes of ruin and regeneration that run through all his work.
Also read: What VS Gaitonde’s rare paper works, part of a recent show, tell us about his art practice
Despite his singular contributions to modern Indian art, Shah was never part of the mainstream. He lived and worked largely outside the commercial circuits of the art world, refusing to align himself with trends or movements. His recognition came gradually, with major retrospectives only arriving late in his career.
‘Hammer on the Square’
In 2016, the Kiran Nadar Museum of Art (KNMA) mounted ‘Hammer on the Square’, his first comprehensive retrospective which showcased his well-known terracotta and bronze works but also his drawings, murals, and rare silver paintings. The exhibition confirmed what many already knew: Shah was not just a sculptor but a deeply philosophical artist whose work engaged with time, material, and memory in profound ways.
Over the years, Himmat Shah received several honours, including the Sahitya Kala Parishad Award in 1988 and the Kalidasa Samman in 2003. But his real legacy lies in his work itself, in the intensity of his sculptures, in the rough-hewn beauty of his materials, and in the questions he left behind — about permanence and impermanence, about form and formlessness, about what it means to leave a trace.
Himmat Shah remained, throughout his life, an artist who followed his own path. He was a man of few words, but his work spoke volumes. He was deeply engaged with history but never weighed down by it. He absorbed traditions not as burdens but as sources of energy. He never sought fame, and remained, to the end, committed to the “emancipatory disposition of art.”
His terracotta heads stare back at us — mute, mysterious, eternal. His drawings contain some unresolved questions. His bronze figures bear the scars of time. In all of them, Himmat Shah remains present, shaping space, shaping history, shaping memory.
