US Supreme Court allows Trump to resume Education Department layoffs

The Supreme Court is allowing President Donald Trump to put his plan to dismantle the Education Department back on track — and to go through with laying off nearly 1,400 employees.

With the three liberal justices in dissent, the court on Monday (July 14) paused an order from US District Judge Myong Joun in Boston, who issued a preliminary injunction reversing the layoffs and calling into question the broader plan. The layoffs "will likely cripple the department," Joun wrote. A federal appeals court refused to put the order on hold while the administration appealed.

The apex court action enables the administration to resume work on winding down the department, one of Trump's biggest campaign promises.

In a post on Monday night on his social media platform, Trump said the top court "has handed a Major Victory to Parents and Students across the Country". He said the decision will allow his administration to begin the "very important process" of returning many of the department's functions "BACK TO THE STATES".

Three Justices dissent

The court did not explain its decision in favour of Trump, as is customary in emergency appeals. But in dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor complained that her colleagues were enabling legally-questionable action on the part of the administration.

She said the majority gave Trump the power to repeal laws passed by Congress “by firing all those necessary to carry them out”.

"When the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, and then executes on that promise, it is the Judiciary's duty to check that lawlessness, not expedite it," Sotomayor wrote for herself and Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan.

Also Read: Voice of America shuts down? Over 600 employees laid off

“The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naïve, but either way the threat to our Constitution’s separation of powers is great,” wrote Sotomayor in her 19-page dissent.

The court’s majority did not explain its decision in the brief, unsigned order.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon said it's a "shame" it took the Supreme Court's intervention to let Trump's plan move ahead.

"Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organisation, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies," McMahon said in a statement.

Lawsuit to continue

A lawyer for the Massachusetts cities and education groups that sued over the plan said the lawsuit will continue, adding no court has yet ruled that what the administration wants to do is legal.

Also Read: Boston: Hundreds march in protest against Trump and Musk

"Without explaining to the American people its reasoning, a majority of justices on the US Supreme Court have dealt a devastating blow to this nation's promise of public education for all children. On its shadow docket, the Court has yet again ruled to overturn the decision of two lower courts without argument," Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, said in a statement.

SC supports Trump

The Supreme Court has handed Trump one victory after another in his effort to remake the federal government, after lower courts have found the administration's actions probably violate federal law. Last week, the justices cleared the way for Trump's plan to significantly reduce the size of the federal workforce. On the education front, the high court has previously allowed cuts in teacher-training grants to go forward.

Separately on Monday, more than 20 states sued the administration over billions of dollars in frozen education funding for after-school care, summer programmes, and more.

Also Read: Trump's America | Why CIA wants to 'buyout' its entire workforce

Education Department employees who were targetted by the layoffs have been on paid leave since March, according to a union that represents some of the agency's staff.

Joun's order had prevented the department from fully terminating them, though none had been allowed to return to work, according to the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. Without Joun's order, the workers would have been terminated in early June.

The Education Department had said earlier in June that it was "actively assessing how to reintegrate" the employees. A department email asked them to share whether they had gained other employment, saying the request was meant to "support a smooth and informed return to duty".

Two consolidated lawsuits

The current case involves two consolidated lawsuits that said Trump's plan amounted to an illegal closure of the Education Department.

One suit was filed by the Somerville and Easthampton school districts in Massachusetts along with the American Federation of Teachers and other education groups. The other legal action was filed by a coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general.

Also Read: Amid layoffs, US introduces new rules to help sacked H-1B visa holders extend stay

The suits argued that layoffs left the department unable to carry out responsibilities required by Congress, including duties to support special education, distribute financial aid, and enforce civil rights laws.

(With agency inputs)