Trump govt pushes baby bonus, pro-family policies to reverse US birth slump

The Trump administration is considering a bold new direction to address America’s declining birth rate: pronatalist policies aimed at encouraging marriage and childbirth.

In recent weeks, senior White House officials have held meetings with conservative advocacy groups to explore initiatives that would place family-building at the core of national policy.

Also Read: US: SC in unanimous decision preserves access to widely-used abortion medication

Baby bonus proposed

One of the stand-out proposals includes a $5,000 “baby bonus” to mothers after childbirth.

Other suggestions under consideration are expanded child tax credits and fertility education programmes that teach ovulation tracking and menstrual health - steps designed to reduce barriers to parenthood.

One more controversial proposal would reserve 30 per cent of slots in the prestigious, federally-funded Fulbright scholarship programme for applicants who are married or have children.

This signals a dramatic shift in how the US evaluates candidates for its most respected academic fellowships.

Pronatalist push

While administration officials have not committed to any specific plan to reverse the country's declining birth rate, there is reportedly clear interest at the highest levels of the government in placing birth-rate issues at the centre of the administration's long-term agenda.

Also Read: Abortion laws: When the one with the uterus doesn't get to decide

Led by influential voices like Vice President JD Vance and billionaire Elon Musk, the pronatalist movement sees the family as a bedrock institution in the decline.

Vance, a father of three, calls falling fertility a “civilisational crisis,” and frequently appears at public events with his children to underscore the administration's pro-family image.

Similarly, Musk, father to at least 14 children, views increased reproduction as essential to humanity’s future.

The Tesla CEO reportedly supports the idea of repopulating the planet with people of "high intelligence" as part of his long-term goal to colonise Mars.

Decline sparks alarm

The US birth rate has been falling steadily since the 1990s.

According to a recent CDC report, the total fertility rate in 2023 stood at just 1.62 births per woman — well below the replacement level of 2.1.

The decline has sparked growing alarm on the political right, where many see the traditional family unit as essential to societal stability.

Comprehensive efforts

Experts attribute the drop in birth rate to a mix of economic and cultural factors, including rising living costs, greater workforce participation by women, and shifting social values.

While policy blueprints are being drafted, some through conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, critics argue that financial incentives alone are insufficient.

They argue that without substantial economic relief - such as affordable childcare, accessible healthcare, and wage support - these incentives are unlikely to make a meaningful impact.

Contrasting ideology

The US administration’s stance on reproductive health reveals inconsistencies, particularly concerning access to in vitro fertilisation (IVF).

While the Trump administration has publicly pledged IVF expansion, it remains torn between different factions in the conservative movement — some supportive of assisted reproduction and others opposing such technologies as threats to traditional family values.

This internal tension mirrors broader societal debates over fertility, freedom, and the future of the American family.

Hard-line conservative proposals include investigating environmental causes of infertility, promoting "natural fertility" practices, and resisting reproductive technologies like IVF, arguing that they undermine traditional family systems.

Also Read: How the new abortion law fails to give women the absolute right over their bodies

Abortion agenda

This renewed push for fertility and family policies also follows a significant rollback of abortion rights during Trump’s first term, when the justices he appointed played a key role in overturning the landmark Roe vs Wade decision, which had established abortion as a constitutional right.

Since then, many states have enacted stringent abortion bans, creating a medical crisis for pregnant women and a legal minefield for doctors.

With miscarriages accounting for up to 20 per cent of pregnancies — and nearly 50 per cent for women over 45 — many obstetricians have left restrictive states or switched specialties, creating a severe gap in reproductive healthcare access.

Policy vs reality

Advocates of pronatalist policies say the new agenda empowers families and secures America’s future. Detractors warn it’s an ideological gambit that could burden women without offering genuine support.

Also Read: Women in rich countries are having fewer kids, or none at all. What’s going on?

These initiatives are already under scrutiny, with critics asserting that the administration’s cultural agenda favours ideology over practical solutions.

With the absence of strong economic measures to reduce poverty, safeguard healthcare access, and ease the financial strain of child-rearing, they warn that new incentives might not only fall short but could also pressure families into unsustainable choices.