Sivaganga custodial death: Madurai bench raps TN police, asks why no FIR registered?
x
The Madurai bench has also issued key directives to expedite the investigation in the Sivaganga custodial death involving a temple guard Ajith Kumar (in pic) and laid down a time limit for the post-mortem and inquiry reports to be submitted today

Sivaganga custodial death: Madurai bench slams TN police, asks 'why no FIR registered?'

The Madurai bench of the Madras high court also said the state government must take responsibility for the youth’s death during police interrogation


The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court sharply criticised the Tamil Nadu Police on Tuesday (July 1) during the hearing of the custodial death case of Ajith Kumar, a 27-year-old temple security guard from Sivaganga.

The case, which has triggered widespread protests and public outrage, centers on allegations of brutal police torture leading to Ajith’s death.

Also read: Sivaganga custodial death | HC slams govt: ‘Was the deceased a terrorist?’

Alleged torture

Ajith Kumar, a temporary security guard at the Madapuram Badrakaliamman Temple, died on June 28, 2025, after alleged torture during police interrogation over a gold theft complaint. A viral video showing police assaulting the youth contradicted initial police claims that Ajith’s death was due to epilepsy and injuries from a fall.

Vinoth, who was also interrogated alongside Ajith, provided a chilling account, shared, “The police shoved chilli powder into Ajith Kumar’s mouth and beat him.”

Also read: TN custodial death: AIADMK seeks CBI probe

This revelation has further fuelled public anger over the brutality of the interrogation.

Bench poses questions

During the court proceedings, the bench, comprising posed tough questions to the state authorities: Why was no FIR registered immediately after the gold theft complaint? Why was the Superintendent of Police (SP) only transferred and not suspended? Why was Ajith interrogated outside the police station instead of at the Thiruppuvanam station, as per protocol?

Moreover, the bench questioned the lack of action against the SP and Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) involved in the case?

Accountability required

The judges stressed the need for accountability, and said, “We are not blaming the entire police force, but those responsible for this offense must face action.”

The justices also held the state accountable, declaring, “The government must take responsibility for the youth’s death during police interrogation.”

Also read: TN custodial death: Murder charges included, five policemen arrested

Meanwhile, responding to questions about the custodial death, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin said, “Action has been taken as soon as the information came to light.” Despite his statement, public and judicial scrutiny remains intense, with demands for stricter measures against the perpetrators.

Court's key directives

The court has also issued key directives to expedite the investigation.

The Dean of Rajaji Government Hospital was ordered to submit Ajith Kumar’s postmortem report by 2.15 pm and the Thiruppuvanam judicial magistrate was directed to submit the inquiry report by 3 pm today.

Also read: Sivaganga custodial death case: Post-mortem report reveals brutal torture

Next Story